Tuesday, June 5, 2012
A black Sunday in a Nation already in darkness
The first news of a suicide bomber attacking a church during Sunday service was not strange or overly surprising, not in a nation already used to bomb blasts and the attendant casualty rate. The second news, of a plane ramming into a Lagos suburb, was more alarming and elicited more than the resigned “not again” that greeted the first. With social media abuzz, two things struck me: The plane crashed in Iju Agege and the proximity of my house from the scene.
Continue
Sunday, May 27, 2012
The General, GEJ Voltrons and Hyperboles
I used to
admire General Mohamadu Buhari a lot. In him, I saw an Incorruptible Nigerian,
whom given the chance, could rid our country of its greatest challenge—corruption
in high places.
My view of
Buhari’s incorruptibility remains unchanged, but in view of his actions and
inactions in the wake of the crisis that followed the April 2011 elections, I
do not consider him qualified to air ideas about Nigeria’s snail paced crawl
towards political and economic emancipation from the brigands that now hold her
captive.
Buhari, I
have said before, lost all rights to talk when elder statesmen are called upon,
just as he has lost the goodwill that has ensured he returned time and time
again to compete for that exalted but oft raped position of this nation’s
president. While I still say that Buhari did not ask his supporters to take to
the streets and slake their rage on innocent Nigerians, doing nothing to call
them to order painted him in colours that are not so different from those he
was seeking to oust.
Anyway,
this post is not really about what the man did, or didn’t do, after the
elections last year. This post is about what the man is doing now and what he
intends to do come 2015. Buhari as he is wont, warmed his way back into
national consciousness by declaring in no small words that come 2015, naija
masses will revolt if INEC does not allow for free and fair elections.
Hmm...here we go again, was my reaction when I saw
reference to the statement on twitter, knowing the dams would soon burst and
all hibernating GEJ Voltrons, as tweeps call them, would awake and be up in
arms. My, my, was I right? Reno Omokiri, a young man most armchair activists
like myself have come to expect the most uncouth behaviour possible in the
course of defending his government pay cheque did not disappoint—kind of
reminds one of pre-activist FFK’s brashness. Reno attacks on Buhari’s audacity
to attack the hallowed PDP machine signalled other hibernating voltrons into
action and the battle to ‘call Buhari to order’ was on in earnest.
While I
think the PDP, and GEJ’s camp, are right to defend themselves if someone
wrongly accuses them of wrong doing, in this instance they are absolutely
wrong.
Why?
Simple.
First:
Because Buhari, though he might have accused them of rigging elections in the
past, was only warning of the fall out of any attempt to rig the 2015 ballot. Second:
Other, both highly and lowly placed, Nigerians have issued similar warnings in
the past, and no one bothered to send out the verbal attack dogs.
I think GEJ
is still missing the whole point of being president. He has to understand that
as president he is number one and therefore the first target when things go
wrong, and also the first when praises for things being done right are dished
out.
Also, most
of the technocrats drafted into government to help this unassuming man navigate
foggy landscape of government-citizen relation are still dozing in the zombie
days of military dictatorships, where any and every ‘his/her Excellency’ is
sacred. Gaddem! This is a democracy, no matter how flawed, and people should be
allowed to have opinions. I think it would serve GEJ and those who purport to
speak for him to stick to the substance of opinions, not insinuations and hyperboles.
For PDP and
its supporters: you may have ruled naija for the past 12 years, but you are not
Nigeria and do not represent the masses. It is not given unto you to react to
every statement from perceived political opponents as if you are Nigeria.
For Buhari:
you lost your chance when it was clearly there for the taking. Go home, rest
and advise younger protégées on how to take political opportunities. Also, talk
smart, you are no longer in the army.
For the
naija people: it is coming again, and we are losing ourselves once again to
that sectional divide. When did Boko Haram stop being a PDP invention abeg? We
need to wake up and smell the beans before it burns once again.
Monday, May 14, 2012
Our Roads; Our Death and a Nation Where Life is Cheap
It is almost impossible for anyone travelling between towns
in Nigeria not to pass a recent road carnage. These carnages, usually auto
accidents with fatalities, are becoming more commonplace in Nigeria and are
exacerbated by the extremely low road maintenance culture that is synonymous
with every government since the Gowon years. If you are in a mass transit bus; as
you pass by the twisted chunks of metal and mangled body parts, you hear gasps
of sorrow and shouts of ‘Jesus’, as fellow travellers call on higher powers to
ensure they do not meet the same fate.
We do not really understand what is at stake when one talks
about death on and by our national highways. To make it clearer and perhaps
bring it home, I will dwell on my own personal experience. This year is yet
half way through but I have lost three people close to me to auto accidents in
the three geographical zones of Nigeria. The first was my cousin, Eddy Oha,
whose journey to Lagos from Akure where he resides with his wife and children
was truncated at Ijebu Ode when the commercial bus he was travelling somersaulted
severally. He died later that evening at the University of Ibadan teaching hospital—where
little was done to save his life.
A few weeks ago, I learnt of the death of Adolphus, a
cousin’s husband, in an auto accident as he was returning to his base in
Malunfashi from a business trip to Kano. Another shock came on 28 April when
the news of Kenechuckwu Igbo’s death via an Okada accident in Enugu reached me.
The above mentioned people represent numbers in the statistics
for those lost to all manners of auto accidents. They are numbers on a sheet of
paper to the government employee that will type them out by this year’s end,
they are numbers to the head of the FRSC that will read them out to show
whether safety on our roads have increased or decreased when 2012 is reviewed.
To people who study the charts for thesis and whatnot, they are numbers on a
page. Whether those who write them down or those who quote them remember that
these numbers represent individuals, represent dreams untimely broken,
represent tears and sorrow, is a guess that I do not think of dwelling on at
this time.
Millions of Nigerians are travelling along our highways as
you read this. Chances are that many, passing wreckages not yet removed or
recent carnages, will have tales of near misses or other gory scenes witnessed
in times past. They will wail and gnash teeth at the thought of lives lost, but
soon minds are forced to less depressing thoughts, after all, the death of a
stranger is not much of an incident—or so the old Igbo adage infers. However,
chances are, in passing vehicle, or even the unfortunate ones, there is someone
heading to the funeral of someone who died in an auto accident. To people like
the fore mentioned, the scene just witnessed poses deeper meanings, for them
the statistics represent loved ones, untimely taken, for them it is more than
just a number.
For me, the statistics stopped being a number about three
years ago when I lost my best friend to an auto accident in Kaduna. My friend,
Chimezie Okieyi, survived an earlier accident in 2003, which kept him at in a
ward at the orthopaedic hospital in Enugu for a year and maimed his left foot,
but the second one took his life—here again the hospital were helpless.
Our hospitals, our
death
Of the people we have buried in my ancestral village this
year, the vast majority died as a result of accidents, deaths I feel could have
been prevented in more ways than one.
To give a perspective, I will dwell a bit about my cousin’s
death. Eddy Oha was involved in the auto accident at about 9 am on Tuesday the
31st of January 2012. As is the Nigerian experience, good Samaritans
rushed him to a hospital, where nothing was done to save his life. It took
calls on his phone for his friends to find out about his situation. His friends
rushed from Akure to the hospital in Ijebu Ode to meet him lying on the floor
with only a drip on him, still the hospital charged N25000 for that drip, a
tranquiliser and the floor space he had occupied for about five hours before
his friends got there and they were allowed to move him to another hospital.
The debate of whether to take him to LUTH or University of Ibadan Teaching
Hospital was quickly solved on account of Lagos’s perpetual traffic jam. All
the hope of prompt attention expected for accident victims disappeared on
getting to Ibadan where the hospital officials appeared more interested in
documentation and payments than diving in an attempting to save a life. Eddy Oha,
with broken legs but no external injuries, died at about five PM, two hours
after arriving at the teaching hospital. In the two hours, he was there, only a
drip was administered to him, while we ran around, queuing up to pay for this
and that. I still believe that had instant medical attention being provided for
him, my cousin would be alive today.
A few years ago, I witnessed an instance similar to the one
that played out with my cousin when a fence collapsed on a woman in my then
neighbourhood. We had rushed the woman to Ikeja General Hospital, thinking they
would be better equipped to attempt saving her life. The woman was conscious,
talking all through the episode, but it was obvious to all that she was in deep
pain. We go to the hospital anxious and keyed for the type of haste we see in
western movies in emergencies, only to be disappointed by the lackadaisical
attitude of the hospital staff. We had to beg and plead before an attendant
made the move to take the woman from the danfo bus we came in into the
emergency ward. From there it was downhill. We were asked to go and register,
pay for x-ray and whatnot. By the time we raised the money required (it was
about 12 midnight) and the woman was wheeled into the x-ray room, she gave up
the ghost, like my cousin, a victim of the careless attitude of our hospitals,
from internal bleeding.
Our Commercial
vehicle, moving coffins
How safe are our commercial vehicles? How sane are our
drivers? How greedy are owners and operator of transport companies? How
concerned is the government and it agencies?
These questions are very important if we ever hope to save
lives on our highways. If we can find answers to why the people who are
empowered by government to oversee the cars that ply our highways, fail to see
dangers of improvised seats in commercial vehicles, then we are well on our way
to abating premature deaths on our highways.
If no law exists to prohibit nonstandard seats in commercial
vehicles in Nigeria, perhaps it is time to legislate on one. We all know how
much research goes into designing cars, and how disastrous any alteration that
goes against the design can be. People in other climes have claimed billions of
dollars in damages from car companies because of defective parts. Here, we
knowingly distort the design to create space for more passengers and make more
money.
While the greed of the owners of commercial vehicles knows
no bounds, the acquiescence of the security agents, who do little to secure the
lives they are mandated to, should not be forgotten.
Why do we insist on having these little Toyota buses and van
transport our people? We all know the bigger buses are safer and better. Is it
not time we make them the transport vehicles of choice.
Our cars are death traps, our roads are death traps, our
hospitals are no help, and the government looks on, mute to our spilled blood.
Death, it appears, is our lot in our travels everyday—unless we have the means
to fly.
That is our dilemma, our circles of inefficiencies kill our
people, and no one cares enough to make a change.
I am all about change. We have to make a difference; we have
to save lives, to force government to make the effort and accept that every
Nigerian has the right for a chance at life. We have to question why almost
everyone with internal bleeding, but without the means to go to a well-stocked
private hospital, stands little chance of surviving at any government
hospital.
To do this, I say we put a name to the statistics as I have
done above. If you have ever lost someone dear to an accident on a Nigerian
road, please comment on this post and put a name to the number. We can change
the attitude.
Monday, April 30, 2012
Before you 'kill' Zimmerman
There is no
doubt of George Zimmerman’s guilt in the shooting that led to the death of
Trayvon Martin, there however remains doubt as to whether the killing was in
cold blood or an act of self defence. The trial that is ongoing is primarily
expected to answer that question, at least beyond reasonable doubt.
Of the
killing, Zimmerman says it was an act of desperate self-defence, against a boy
he thought just a few years younger, an admission that many contest on grounds
that he had a gun, and was more physically imposing that the unarmed youth he
say he was fighting off. There is also that commonly held belief, within black
America and elsewhere, that there is a racist undertone to Zimmerman’s action
and the reaction of the police to the case afterwards. That Zimmerman insisted
on going after the boy after the officer answering his 911 call indicated
that he not do so, is a clear sign he racially profiled the boy and marked him
as guilty of something, many contend.
Though
Zimmerman and his backers say this is not the case, he couldn’t have profiled
the kid that way, his background would not allow him do that—discriminate on
grounds of colour—the doubt still rests heavily on his shoulders.
The whole
argument on racial profiling seriously begs the question: what is racial
profiling and how could that have led to the death of a boy that harmless and
young?
Racial/tribal
profiling exists in different forms in different places. Some are negative,
other not so much so. In Nigeria, the belief that people from Warri have a high
sense of humour, that the average Hausa man is honest to a fault, that the Igbo
can do anything for money, that the Yoruba are cowards are some of the milder
forms of racial profiling. The extra security that a green Nigerian passport or
a Semitic appearance triggers in airports in the west is a more unsavoury form,
at least for those on the receiving end.
For blacks
in America, ethnic profiling of the negative kind is a reality and has existed
for centuries in various forms. I read somewhere that the whites perceive the
average black American as lazy. For a community that effectively raised America
to its present status on the strength of their toil on the cotton fields,
tobacco fields and countless other slave labour engagements, laziness should be
the last thing that mention of them evokes. Nevertheless, there is that other
one, the one that sees blacks as having a lower IQ than whites, one so well
expressed by John Derbyshire is his viral article. Other unsavoury profiles, for both blacks and
whites, do exist in the American society and they have for centuries and may
well continue to for a long time to come.
No one can
readily say when or how these negative profiling started or what their purposes
are, but it is not farfetched to see in them the inherent mistrust man have for
anything that looks or feels different. Perhaps, wanting to live apart from
those of other races/tribes worked well in the past, but the world today is a
global community. It is just not possible to be exclusive.
That said;
one would not shy from arguing that the black American community have not
exactly done much to dispel the negative profiles that have hung around it for
decades, if not centuries. Unlike the white American community that tries hard
to show it is a community of contrasts where you have the good and the bad, there
seem to be an unconscious move by the blacks to cultivate the aggressive image,
perhaps as a kind of defence mechanism after years of oppressive living under
the whites. I really don’t know, just grasping at straws here, but the
stereotype of the black American that is commonplace is that of highly strung
individuals with ill repressed anger that is always threatening to blow up,
with disastrous consequences.
While this
description would in reality describe only a minute amount of people in the
black community, the others chose to wear it as a garb, a kind of communal
identity that only spells doom. I have heard mention of the nature of the
American system and how it predisposes black to drop out of school and fail,
how that is the cause of a higher percentage of them than whites in America’s
prison system, how it makes it harder for them to find work. However, coming
from where I am coming from, I say they, and only they, can make good no matter
the situation. Well, that is my take, I know the debate of whether the system
set black up to fail is still on and will continue for much longer.
Getting
back to Zimmerman, if we are to agree with those insisting he racially profiled
Trayvon Martin, then, we are agreeing that the common racial profiling of black
Americans is negative. That being the case, Zimmerman, A neighbourhood watch
volunteer (I think they operate in much the same way neighbourhood watches
operate in Nigeria, with police as the authority and the volunteers referring
cases to them), saw a black youth in a hoodie walking by a thought “crime”. He
gave case, pulled his gun at some point and shot the youth dead, only it turned
out the suspect was just an innocent boy out for some snacks.
Trayvon
Martin is dead; nothing that happens now can change that fact. We have to keep
in mind that black youths have been breaking into houses in that neighbourhood
for some time before this incident, and that this might justify Zimmerman’s
profiling, but does that change much? The boy is dead. In his death and in the
death of thousands of people world over, we see further evidence of man’s inability
to live with man without conflict, in his death lies the shame of our age.
In his
death lie lessons for his community and everyone else. While incidents of
history like this one may make it seem expedient to glorify the thug life, to
see offense as a form of defense, we have to be wary that times have changed.
The celebration of the criminal life, something sagging pants and a hoodie
pulled over the eyes to hide the face at night tends to glorify, is not the way
to go.
The world
needs to take another look at the music stars that encourage the gangland
lifestyle, who rap and talk about killing one another in glowing terms. Black America need to
adopt more positive role models for their kids, they need to show them the many
positive examples being set by the children of immigrant family, of which their
president is one, who have taken the opportunities available and made good. They need to tell people like 50 Cents and Lil Wayne to stop being
bad influences on their kids by mouthing negative lyrics, they need to learn to
stay married and raise kids in decent homes. Most importantly, they need to
stop complaining of white America’s ill treatment and take the immense opportunities
their society offers.
For the
zimmerman’s of this world, whatever reason caused him to kill the youth, the
right to take a life is not yours, and “standing your ground” does not make it
right when the person you are confronting is unarmed.
For the people
angry and gunning for revenge, think about how many blacks were killed in black
on black violence in America this week before you kill Zimmerman in your head.
Justice is
from above.
Friday, April 13, 2012
Trayvon Martin: Beyond the Outcry
Everyone that pays attention to the media,
especially international media from the west, must have at this point in time
heard about Trayvon Martin. If by chance you happen to have crawled under a
rock in Mars for the last one month and thus missed the whole commotion,
Trayvon Martin is the 17-year-old boy shot and killed by George Zimmerman, a neighbourhood
watch volunteer.
If you don’t know about the details of the
case, as many still don’t, you might not think much of a headline that says
“boy killed by guard”. But why should you think different, News headlines are replete with such news stories
anyway.
However, the Trayvon Martin case is unique in more ways than one. Not only is the late Trayvon Martin a minor, he was unarmed and not partaking in anything illegal at the time he was fatally shot by Zimmerman. Sad, you might say, another young boy at the wrong place at the wrong time.
Yes, Trayvon Martin was at the wrong place at the wrong time. Wrong time and place for a black youth to be in 21st century America. Wrong place to be, but right sort of place to get a bullet in the chest. A bullet fired by a white adult male who clearly outweighs him.
However, the Trayvon Martin case is unique in more ways than one. Not only is the late Trayvon Martin a minor, he was unarmed and not partaking in anything illegal at the time he was fatally shot by Zimmerman. Sad, you might say, another young boy at the wrong place at the wrong time.
Yes, Trayvon Martin was at the wrong place at the wrong time. Wrong time and place for a black youth to be in 21st century America. Wrong place to be, but right sort of place to get a bullet in the chest. A bullet fired by a white adult male who clearly outweighs him.
For those who have had the time in this dreary economic climate to follow the ruckus that emanated after the news sipped out
that Mr. George Zimmerman, the killer of that innocent boy, was allowed to walk
free after the fact, two truths ring clear: Zimmerman pulled the trigger of the
gun that took the young boys life, the victim was armed with skittles and a cup
of ice tea at the time of the shooting and was not doing anything
untoward—except we follow George Zimmerman’s contention that the boy was
walking aimlessly around the neighbourhood and agree with him that that constitutes a crime.
I feel profound sympathy for the family of
the late Trayvon Martin and can only hope they find the strength to bear the
loss, but the issue at hand is deeper than the death of a boy that made his
parents proud.
I also feel sympathy for black Americans,
who have had to contend with similar killings by high-handed and often times
racially motivated white gunmen. I watch the news story and share the rage and
confusion of those who ask that the boy’s killer face justice, not because I am
of the same race with a majority of those I see carrying placards calling for justice, but because I never ever believed in extra-judicial killing
by anyone.
As a Nigerian who has not personally
experienced the blind racism that many allude to in the west, that one reads
about, sees in movies and TV debates, I cannot claim to fully understand what
it feels like to be discriminated against because of one’s colour. I know many
say tribalism is similar, but I think it is only superficially so as one’s
tribe cannot easily be decoded at first glance--one’s race is usually as clear as day.
However, as justified as my anger and that
of millions around the world itching for justice is, I also know that getting
justice for Trayvon Martin should not be the end of it. It is easy to march on
the street and call for the arrest of one man, but forgetting that the arrest
and possible imprisonment of one man does not change the situation on the
ground that made his alleged crime possible. There is now greater need for
people the world over to look at how we relate to ourselves. Should we continue
hating because we don’t understand, or seek knowledge to make us better
understand?
Across the world, people continue to hate
more than they love, to kill more than they save and the destroy more than they
build. Life, particularly human life is considered most sacred by religions
world over. Yet, in this earth, man continues to see killing as a means of
settling real and perceived disputes.
Trayvon Martin is just another notch on the
pole that marks the billion untimely taken as a result of man’s resolve to take
rather than give life to his kind and George Zimmerman, whether he pleads self-defence
or not, broke the law of nature, he killed Trayvon Martin.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)