Once again, like uncountable times in the past, the north is
in the throes of ethno-religious crisis. As usual, the security agencies are caught
napping and aside from accusations of complicity in the crisis, seem to be all
thumbs, with little or no idea of how to handle the situation – besides their
age-old ‘shoot on sight’ solution that is.
In a previous article, written some years ago, I dwelled on
the nature of the north and after examining the numerous crises I witnessed and
luckily escaped while living in the north, concluded that ethno-religious
crisis and the north of Nigeria are Siamese twins that may forever remain
conjoined, unless the drastic is done.
I warned then that the north would blow up again way before
the Boko Haram clash and the first Jos affair. My forecast was not based on any
form of prescience, but as a result of a brief study of ethno-religious clashes
in the north.
In the north of Nigeria, from Jos and beyond, the truth
about Ethno-religious crisis is not if it would occur, but when it will occur,
again.
Let us not be deceived, the fight is more ethnic than
religious, it is more about land than which prophet is greater, it is
ultimately more about the language of ancestors than the language of any sacred
text, ultimately, it is more about political control.
This fight is about the rights of the individual to exist
with all benefits that accrue to a Nigerian anywhere in this country. In Jos,
the Hausa-Fulani is fighting for relevance. They could not get the control they
sought through the ballot; hence, the resort to violence, something evidence
over the years have shown them to have a large stock of – fuelled by
large-scale poverty and miss-education, something very common in this country.
The so-called natives of Jos – the Birom et al – are fighting to hold unto what they say is ancestrally theirs.
The so-called natives of Jos – the Birom et al – are fighting to hold unto what they say is ancestrally theirs.
However, before we accuse the people of Jos of ethnic
discrimination, let us remember that every Nigerian is guilty of this one way
or the other. Many Nigerians will argue this point, countering that the
Nigerian constitution grants liberty to every Nigerian, but when you think
about the possibility of an Igbo becoming governor of, let’s say, Lagos state,
the point looms clearer and then you really understand what is at stake.
I grew up in the north and can say without fear of contradiction that the Hausa-Fulani is as prone to bigotry as the Igbo, Yoruba or Birom. I recall the policy of indigenisation during my primary and secondary school days, which allowed for two separate sets of school fees, one for the so-called settlers another for the so-called indigenes. I still laugh anytime I remember the name changes that many of my friends had to endure in other to benefit from the considerable lesser school fees meant for the so-called indigenes. I still recall the dropping of surnames and the adoption of perceived Hausa names by many of my Igbo and Yoruba neighbours just to belong to that class. It was as if being Nigerian was not enough, you have to be something else too, in this case a pseudo-tribesman.
I am not a lawyer and have not paid much heed to the
Nigerian constitution (this will change soon), but it has always been my belief
that people are indigenes of where they are born. That should be the standard.
However, Nigeria is a peculiar place with peculiar ways – uncanny most times – of
interpreting the law. In Nigeria, you are an indigene of where ever your
father/grandfather hails, whether you know that place is not of consequence;
hence the dropping of names native to any tribe by those who want to be seen as
indigenes in their present domicile.
There lies the genesis of the problem in Jos, the
Hausa-Fulani, having lived more than 150 years in the area, feel they should be
treated as equals. They seek to wield political power, to have a say in how
they are governed. While there is nothing wrong, fundamentally, with this
desire, the peculiarities I mentioned earlier deny them this right, just as it
denies millions of other Nigerians every day.
As an Igbo man in Kaduna and now in Lagos, I cannot recall
the number of times I have been reminded of my status as a visitor. I was a
visitor in Kaduna, despite spending my first 22 years there before leaving
because of the constant threat that hangs over the neck of any southerner in the
far north and the constant, unconscious, seeking of fastest routes to an army
or police barrack as Friday prayers wind up. Though perceived as a visitor in
Lagos, that fear of decapitation by a seething mob is gone, but not altogether,
as I now endure fear of one chance and whatnot. Its naija, you are not really
safe anywhere.
Yes, Jos burns, again, and will do so again. Just as many
other trouble spots in the north will too unless we stop deceiving ourselves,
continuously believing, perhaps hoping, after every blow up, that we have seen
the last. Far from it, we will continue to see these crises until we wake up
and admit that we need to rethink and rephrase the laws that hold us together,
albeit loosely, as a country.
Let us look into the past and learn. Let us set far-reaching
goals that will ultimately make us a greater country. Let us not fear change,
for it is inevitable. I believe the solution is a simple one; it only needs a
willing leader to get it done. Some say this is one crisis to many, I say it is
the hundredth of many more to come if we do not address the root causes.
Let us sit together and answer the question that desperately
needs an answer, “are we Nigerians first and members of a tribe second?” Let us
throw away this constitution if it is not working properly and draw up a new
one that will guide us into the light we so seek, or if need be, grant it the
muscle it needs to properly work.
I say let the talks begin! Enough is enough!
This piece was first published by 234Next in January 2011
No comments:
Post a Comment